By: Brandon Stein
If you or someone you know was injured in a car accident at or near a construction zone, contact our Florida construction lawyers today.
Being a North Miami construction lawyer that helps those injured in car accidents on highways, I frequently come across road blocks (no pun intended) in litigation when trying to sue the Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”). Florida personal injury lawyers are always aggressive, but when it comes to attacking the Department of Transportation, the FDOT typically hides behind the shield of sovereign immunity. Florida Statute 768.28 details sovereign immunity, and is almost always cited in arguments by the FDOT.
Not to delve into an entire legal thesis, but essentially the FDOT is immune from construction litigation arising out of an injury resulting from “faulty” roadway or highway design. So, for any South Florida driver that is injured in a car accident and retains a lawyer to sue the FDOT because the highway was designed improperly or dangerously, be prepared for intense litigation.
As a South Florida construction injury lawyer, I have many cases against the Department of Transportation despite the presence of sovereign immunity. In fact, today we are in mediation for a highway car accident on I-95 in Miami involving the FDOT, as well as several other contractors. The car accident occurred back in 2008 and involved the newly installed “Express Lanes.” Essentially, these express lanes are two toll lanes that are
separated from the rest of traffic through the use of high performance highway tubular delineators. These delineators are essentially large tube-like plastic poles that are often utilized by construction companies for the separation of traffic.
My client had been traveling on I-95 and became trapped in these “Express Lanes.” Unbeknownst to her, when driving within these lanes, no exit is possible for over 10 miles. However, my client had to exit the highway prior to the end of the toll lanes, so she attempted to travel through the delineators in order to exit the highway. Since these delineators were 20 feet apart, it gave drivers the appearance that travelling in between them was indeed possible — but it was not possible. Unfortunately, my client crashed her car and had been involved in a near-death car accident. Fire rescue and ambulances arrived to the scene instantly and thankfully her life was spared.
A major defendant in this construction car accident case is the Florida Department of Transportation. As expected, a major defense of the FDOT is sovereign immunity. So, how do you sue the Department of Transportation for this Florida highway construction car accident? Most Florida lawyers should be familiar with the exception to sovereign immunity. Simply stated, or as simply as one could state this complex area of law, when a dangerous condition exists that is known by the state (i.e. FDOT), the state owes a duty to the general public, such as my client, to warn of this known dangerous condition.

Ultimately, certain precautions must be taken by the state when undertaking construction projects on Florida’s highways. Especially when a project involves a complete transformation of a highway, the Florida Department of Transportation has a duty to warn and inform the public of this drastic change to a roadway that hundreds of thousands travel on every single day.




most frequently due to tailgating by the other driver. Simply stated, tailgating lessens the reaction time that a driver has to traffic traveling at a slower pace around a construction area.


year old construction worker. This crane accident instantly took the life of the 30 year old worker. The OSHA citations had been directly related to violations of safety standards related to job site security and crane safety.
trained personnel. Additionally, a designated person must inspect the crane prior to use and be sure to follow the manufacturer’s directions for use. Failure to follow these, or any of the other requirements, could certainly result in an OSHA violation — which no construction company wants on its record.


the roadway surface. According to reports, the pavement was uneven, which resulted in the motorcycle losing control while passing through the construction site. The 44 year old was killed instantly and the accident is under investigation.
directing traffic, flaggers are often required to undergo additional training and have more experience than your average construction worker, such as John Smith.
Local authorities state that the man was a part-time worker for the unidentified construction company and worked on an as-needed basis. A construction site injury lawyer has not been hired to represent the 78-year old as of yet, but I would suspect that representation for the worker’s death is forthcoming.

